The political, and balanced, climate...

Ha! It's so ironic, those "climate freaks" as you might call them! Yet it's those down in DC who are also having it tough, thanks to a snowstorm. And so, what must those in authority think about these events in the future? Many of them are NOT against global warming whatsoever now, are they? Yeah. Didn't think so either. Let's not bash on either sides of the issue though. We must respect each side's opinion on climate change. After all, those people who are on both sides of the climate debate issue must be right once in while, right? Just like all of them dems and reps. Sometimes dems win, other times the reps do. And perhaps, maybe, that's what it's about comes down to the topic of climate change. Some say we will soon be entering a warmer phase, while others argue that the opposite is true and that we are destined to be approaching some "cooler" times. Well, as is usually the case, nature cannot satisfy us all. Essentially it is nature itself, which chooses who is right. Once in a while, those who are against the thought of the weather cooling get their fair share from mother nature. Yet, other times, it is the opposing party who "gets to share". So, is that just how our history of weather is now set to enfold? Heat waves and droughts in some months to satisfy those with a desire for proving global warming. And at other times there will be events such as cold spells, ice storms and blizzards to satisfy those who are against global warming. You know how it is. Both parties can (albeit theoretically) benefit from this. Yet there is an issue with all of this. For the question remains, whether (no pun intended) the true nature of weather will EVER be published. And, a new question may arise: "When Republicans finally accept that Climate Change is an actual problem, will they pretend they know all along and blame it on the Muslims?" Stay around for my follow up post next time.