Wow. Un. Freaking. Real. That's exactly what I thought the moment when I first started reading this particular article. After all, it is supposed that it even contains the author's scientific documents in the American Journal of Modern Physics. So, if you've had a boring life recently, please read on. I'm most certain it won't fail to disappoint. BTW, this is way beyond reality IMO just how much "stupidness" is associated with this paper, which looks 100 PERCENT official too! And we don't even need to look at his paper. I must add a note of caution, however, to those of you who enjoy reading this website. I don't mean to bash on it because I don't even know how trustworthy it is. We can just go and start here for more information. This is exactly my definition of EPIC! IT takes epic to levels that are extremely high. So high in fact, that it is up in the clouds. And I'm talking those clouds are not just clouds as you might think about them. They're like the puffs of fragrant smoke that I dream are moving across a waterscape. See where I'm going with this. Oh wait; I may be trying to imagine myself in his (her) shoes, however... Maybe she was not being "high"; after all, almost everything about the report was perfect. Except for maybe a few words. A scientist who publishes in a scientific journal should always double check their work using "Autocorrect". Unless, of course, they've never heard of that feature. This is the opposite of what it means when you think of boring.
These kinds of stories make it all better. Reading her "anthology" was nothing less than music to my ears, or well, "candy to the nose" or whatnot. Let's talk about that Concave Lens technology. What's up with that, right!? Well, in theory this might work, (albeit theoreticall). In practice, however, it's a whole other story. What's up with detecting dark matter light? Is that possible? Well, let's ask a scientist about that one, and he'll probably think about that one for a minute or so and tell you "Uh...no". That's pretty much true, at least for the most part. A concave lens is made not for telescopes. Instead, it used for other optics such as camera lenses and microscopes. What the guy probably is observing is just composed of some microscopic lifeforms. That would explain the odd phenomenon that he initially wrote about. And then, once we look further into her stuff, of course, we realize that she can't differentiate between what is a "multidimensional life form" from that of some lights that are formed by a long shutter speed and come from our own crazy society. Good job, Alaina!)
No comments:
Post a Comment