Thursday, December 10, 2015

"A trolling journal": (what "we need to know")!

This is a special about Yahoo! Answers. Why did I decide to write about this? Well, first off, there many websites on the internet that are "favorites". Many users of Yahoo! might have already experienced their fair share of trolls... although.... in this instance it does not necessarily have to do with trolls. Even if us users find serious Q&A's, we might still have some serious amount of fun. And I can share this knowledge with others, that is (you), in particular, because I'm a regular user of Yahoo! from time to time. This website, in particular, offers its audience questions that others may find truly perplexing. In fact, even the answers can be unusually creative more often than not. This in part is thanks to an interesting, and increasing, community of diverse individuals.  More often than not, in order to these kinds of questions, it may take patience and loads of luck. On rare occasions, people who just like to around in answers give secretive answers that are difficult to find, however, ones that can be the same multiple times. This is a list I'm slowly compiling as I find some of the "most intriguing, hilariously funny, Q&A in existence." It's just a general list of various people's thoughts, whether they be serious, or outright inexplicable.
Others may find certain questions (or answers) as silly. While others may find them serious. In other words, Q&A can be considered many different ways. They may be considered a waste of time, or a good use of the internet. How one thinks of them, is just a matter of who to ask. Whoever is trolling may, simultaneously be serious... (Trolling to some people may be totally acceptable by others' standards) and of course, it can also be the other way around. All in all, Yahoo answers can definitely be amusing, to say the least!
 ALIENSSSSSS, MAAAAAN!
Can I summon Aliens to heal me? This first one has an interesting answer at the very top which I would highly recommend for people to visit the link that is included within the answer, under the "sources" section.
The user who uses the"NEXT RED FLAG" argument

Trolling Alert!: I don't know what's more serious in this instance: This question, or the answer. Alright, I know, what you might be thinking. I'm not trying to be serious here. Yet, if there ever was a prize for most "trollsome", or silly, BEST ANSWER, then this would probably fit the bill really well:
Note: this isn't the EXACT question I was thinking of. However, there was another question which I've noticed... one which I couldn't retrieve, in which this exact answer has IN FACT been chosen as a five star rate!
More is on the way!


Tuesday, December 8, 2015

So now, Alright... my "new" images are into Flickr!!

Check these out!... These are my images from my Summer 2015 tour of the Upper Peninsula. We just went over to the eastern parts, that would just include the area of pictured rocks.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/31391486@N04/
Anyways, so the Northern parts of Michigan are really intriguing. These images were created as I was just playing around with Photoshop. The results were so truly mesmerizing. I came up with so much of them, that was truly incredible how many versions I eventually came up with in Photoshop. So, I decided that I would upload a part of them into Flickr so that I can still leave some additional space onto my memory drive. I was thinking about developing/processing some of my images using technique to increase the camera's own Dynamic Range. This kind of processing is known as High Dynamic Range manipulation. And the original had so much in them, in fact, that using such techniques was practically, for the most part, obsolete. At least that's how it turned out in these circumstances. In fact, I enjoy both HDR images, as well as others. Those that come along with high contrast. Or those that are processed in a way as to show the true depth to them; those with a great amount of whites and blacks. Or simply those that include the right amount of tone to them... the thing that I would like to get at about is that you can increase contrast a number of ways. Whether you adjust levels, curves, or use the RAW processor... the method you use is totally up to you. Sometimes images appear better once they have their dynamic range manipulated, or expanded. Still, other times, images look equally as compelling once their tones really stand out and are contrasting against each other! So this is just one of the ways that photography itself has been quite interesting in general. And for me, I just like to keep all of the versions of images that I come up with. And there is no wrong or right way to achieve what one calls a "perfect" result.

Friday, September 25, 2015

"Talk Paranormal"

I have been banned for being a "spammer", although I still do not know why. I did not mean to post spam on the discussion board "Talk paranormal". I cannot find any contact information. I just posted one link, and it's not like it was irrelevant, or that I had posted it multiple times. The topic was to post your own work, and that would include websites, so I decided it would be great to post my blog article about paranormal phenomenon. Well, if there's anything that I'm thinking, I think I should just move on and find some other websites that I would find interesting. Kind of depressing since I always try to follow the rules. I guess that their guidelines might be a "little" too strict.

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

The "vanishing star"

I have observed some strange stuff in the sky that I'd like to talk about. My most recent was last night. First of all, though, let me tell you about a couple of times I had observed something in the night sky over Lake Michigan. All of the objects that I want to tell about are starlike, & that's where the similarities end. The first observation that I made was back in the summer of 2013. I was at an observation deck with a friend of mine. I started noticing some lights appearing in the sky, which didn't have a trace of cloudiness to it. They had slowly started to fade into darkness. Then, I was really hoping that another one would show up so so instead of me just explaining about it, he could see it for himself. So, we waited some more, and that is when another one showed up, I would say, at least a couple minutes after the first objects did. So I told him that there's another one and pointed to it. It looked just like a satellite, and it was decent in terms of brightness. Then, again, this object slowly faded away. In fact, he told me that there were some other objects he had observed at about the same time that had faded away.
The second observation I had made was of something that had looked like a star, or satellite, except that, this time, it was stationary. It did something a little bit different than the previous ones. This night the sky was also empty of clouds. I had looked away from the object, although I had observed it long enough, so that I now had visualized it's location relative to other stars. I looked back a few seconds later, and guess what? it had gone. It was just as though the "star" had "blinked out" into darkness.
You may or may not know this... however, last night there were some interesting bright objects near the southeastern horizon. And again, the sky was clear this time. I had started observing what had looked like a couple of objects that were quite bright shortly after sunset (about 30 minutes or so) as the western sky still had those twilight hues to it. I tried to observe them through the trees. I got glimpses of them whenever I could get a clear view, although I was kind of busy at the time. They stayed in the same location. However, at least half an hour since I first tried observing them, I noticed one of them seem to start to fade out into darkness.  It wasn't like a smooth, gradual kind of fading out. And it wasn't like what a plane might look like. It would first fade for about one and a half to two seconds until it was practically invisible. Then, it would reemerge. Afterwards, it would fade out again, although each time that it did so, the timing seemed to be different. You know, sometimes it would fade quicker, other times slower. The other one, however, was gone, even though I had observed it as being in the same location much of the time. I had basically assumed that it was a star because it seemed to be stationary. A plane? maybe. Chinese lantern? well, the object- in fact, both of them- were white. And although one might think the description might account for this, there is a problem that needs to be addressed in this situation. The object did not Flicker. It had faded. And, in addition, once the object would fade away, it was invisible for at least a good one and a half seconds, unlike a Chinese lantern. Anyways, when I had observed these objects I was near Eaton Rapids, MI.
Tonight, I am going to observe the sky again, to see if I can observe the objects again near the Eastern horizon. You should take a look outside as well.

Blue lava

http://www.msn.com/en-us/video/wonder/burning-blue-indonesia%e2%80%99s-psychedelic-sulphur-volcano/vi-AAerKu5

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Friday, September 11, 2015

Paranormal phenomena and the world's energy field

This blog post will focus on the world's invisible energy fields, ones whose evidence is rooted in scientific facts. The theory in this post is not merely something thought up by a person who is open minded about the paranormal. Actually, I write this because, again, it's rooted in scientific facts. The most obvious energy field around Earth is the magnetic field. However, the Earth may have multiple of what may be called energy fields. Unlike the Earth's magnetic field ,however, the field created by some of this ambient energy isn't permanent. Instead it can come and go. Now, this may not truly be considered a "field", however, this is likely the best way to describe it, as it is a field in one way or the other. So, how does this fit into the paranormal realm?
Well, that is actually pretty much unknown currently. It is thought in the paranormal community, especially by ghost hunters, that ghosts obtain energy through energy sources such as water, or perhaps electricity. Yet, there are much more exotic forms of energy appearing here on Earth. The general name for all of these energy sources would be radiation. First, we have background radiation. Although this makes for an unimaginably small amount of energy output, the thing about it is that it's constantly emanating from EVERYWHERE.
Solar activity, and earthly phenomena
The second form of energy I'd like to talk about here on Earth is solar energy. You're quite likely to think about visible sunlight, or IR radiation. Still, solar radiation which penetrates the atmosphere is also made up of charged particles. It's a scientific fact that these particles effect the Earth, from having an influence on Earthquakes, to disrupting radio and satellite transmissions. However, one may ponder another, yet mysterious question. Does the intensity of solar activity coincide with paranormal activity? Ghost hunters should investigate this. Perhaps it has something to do with influencing the psych, instead of actual "paranormal" phenomena, if it has such effects at all?
Now, how about cosmic rays? These come into the Earth ,not only by means of our sun. Another source from which they originate is space, in general. They can come from totally astounding distances away. What makes these so interesting, is that billions of them are thought to pass through a person each second! The amount of this energy can dramatically increase upon arrival of a solar storm. Or, an even more exotic event may happen. A gamma ray burst, which can last for at least two hours or so. Well, on that note, here is an amazing fact. Scientific evidence into cosmic rays has shown that these subatomic, high energy particles have the ability to modify clouds here on Earth. Think about that. So, is there any way that ghosts could tap into these energy sources and maybe even manipulate them? I'll talk more about this after I explain some other forms of energy. Anyways, when talking about cosmic particles, one is basically talking about quantum mechanics. And also, these particles don't all originate from the same place, and neither do they all originate at the same time. Could the particles then be influenced by these two factors, the time which they left, and from where they left? Well, that's a fairly difficult question to answer, and yet is a theory of mine. And it's likely to be fairly difficult to answer for several decades or longer. I guess it would best be considered a metaphysical question rather than fall under another category such as quantum mechanics.
Artificial signals
The third form of energy field would be exotic as well, except in the sense that it's something that rarely occurs. This energy is made up of waves. It generally consists of radio waves. This form of energy is coursing through the air virtually everywhere, coming from satellites, radio stations, cellular phone towers, etc. All of the energies included in this post have something in common. They basically form one, enormous, field of energy. One which is made up of various types of energy, each arguably forming their own energy field. Unlike some other types of energy, what makes these energy fields astounding, though, is that all of them are invisible. And they aren't detectable by the human senses. What also makes these interesting is that they arrive in various frequencies. I remember watching the show on the Travel Channel called Ghost Adventures. On one particular episode, an engineer brings in a machine that listens to noise by scanning various frequencies. The crew then uses the machine in a haunted location. You know, obviously humans have a specific range of frequencies which they can detect. Of course, technology does a great job at detecting these undetectable energies. However, even with modern technology, it's a challenge to be able to see and hear everything that may be lurking around.